Pouemi distinguished **monetary sovereignty** by state capacity. [fact]
On the continuum of monetary sovereignty, he distinguished four categories as far as the African countries were concerned. Firstly, those states that tried to manage their currencies well but suffered a hostile international economic context: the countries of the Global North tried to discourage the industrialisation of the Global South and to this end did not hesitate to exploit the IMF, which, according to Pouemi, had the tendency to 'repress any government that tries to offer their country a minimum of wellbeing'. Secondly, those countries that possessed the monetary instrument but used it ill-advisedly. Internal 'monetary repression' or 'self-repression' (small presence of Africans in the banking sector, negative interest rates, self-financing practices and price controls, especially in the agricultural sector) were, in his opinion, a gangrene for economic progress. Thirdly, those states that employed 'satellite currencies', that is, national currencies functionally integrated with those of their former colonisers, through the free movement of capital and fixed exchange rates. The fourth and final case concerned those countries whose currencies were still administered on the basis of colonial principles and logics, and which, according to Pouemi, were by all means 'colonial currencies'. The reference was mainly to the countries that used the CFA franc.
Fanny Pigeaud_ Ndongo Samba Sylla, Africa's Last Colonial Curr…, loc. 191