Mehmed Ali pursued contradictory goals of rebellion and pardon simultaneously. [fact]
Reviewing the Pasha's position from the time of starting hostilities until their cessation can illustrate this point further. After sending his troops to Syria and after undertaking what could only be taken as a blatant act of rebellion against the authority of the Sultan, Mehmed Ali was still hoping to acquire Syria and to be pardoned by Mahmud at the same time. Documents abound showing how Mehmed Ali in 1832 still thought that he could get away with his act and that he could, in effect, both have his cake and eat it too. While besieging the fortress of Acre for eight months during which numerous letters were sent from Istanbul urging him to desist and warning him of the consequences if he did not, he was still pleading for forgiveness from the Sultan and asking to be given Syria without being declared a rebel.
Builds on: "Egyptian context explains the gap between plan and execution."
Khaled Fahmy, All the Pasha_s Men_ Mehmed…, loc. 182