Jamal Awil

← An Engine, Not a Camera

Friedman's essay was designed to rebut. [fact]

When, in the 1950s and the 1960s, an older generation of more descriptively oriented scholars of finance encountered the work of the new finance theorists, their reaction was, as has already been noted, often a species of "the perennial criticism of orthodox' economic theory as unrealistic"' (Friedman 1953a, p. 30) that Friedman's essay was designed to rebut. Friedman made explicit a vital aspect of what, borrowing a term from Knorr Cetina (1999), we might call the "epistemic culture" of modern orthodox economics. In so doing, he gave finance theorists a defense against the most common criticism of them, despite his doubts as to whether some parts of finance theory were genuine contributions to economics.

Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera, loc. 62