This is what happens when we allow so many of our previously private actions to be enclosed by corporate tech platforms whose founders said they were about connecting us but were always about extracting from us. The process of enclosure, of carrying out our activities within these private platforms, changes us, including how we relate to one another and the underlying purpose of those relations. This goes back to early forms of enclosure, beginning in the Middle Ages. When common lands in England were transformed into privately held commodities surrounded by hedges and fences, the land became something else: its role was no longer to benefit the community—with shared access to communal grazing, food, and firewood—but to increase crop yields and therefore profits for individual landowners. Once physically and legally enclosed, the soil began to be treated as a machine, whose role was to be as productive as possible.

XREF: Connects to the historical concept of enclosure in English agrarian history, drawing a provocative parallel between physical commons and the digital commons. SEED: Could become an essay on 'digital enclosure' — how private platforms reorder human relations just as hedged common lands once did.

Naomi Klein, Doppelganger, loc. 126