If this was an issue raised by the appellant, the majority would have (and has on numerous occasions) summarily dismissed this contention by citing the well-worn and well-established rule that there was “no objection at trial, thus nothing is presented for review.” For some unexplained reason the majority fails to apply that same rule of law to the State, in its appeal before this Court.

Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide …, loc. 1011