Eighteenth-century individualism equated freedom with an innate, equal human nature. [causal]
The elaborations that the principle or ideal of individualism has undergone in the modern era differ according to the accentuation given to the first or the second of these meanings. On the whole, the eighteenth century sought individuality in the form of freedom, the lack of every kind of restraint on personal powers, regardless whether this restraint came from the estates or from the church, whether it was political or economic. But at the same time, the assumption prevailed that once men had been freed from all sociohistorical fetters, they would show themselves to be essentially equal; that “man in general,” along with all the goodness and perfection of his nature, was inherent in every personality, needing only to be emancipated from those distorting and diverting bonds.
XREF: Connects to the broader tension between liberty and equality that runs through modern political thought, from Rousseau to contemporary debates about liberalism.
Georg Simmel, on individuality and social…, loc. 650