Direct-amendment plans would destroy constitutional permanence through endless campaigns. [causal]
In the first place, such a plan would make the Constitution a political football: no supermarket parking lot would be safe from petition-floggers, seeking signatures and handing out buttons. On every ballot, there would be a long list of referenda. The commercials that now are given over to candidates would be joined by thirty-second spots on constitutional amendments, and no sooner would one of these be adopted than its repeal would become the focus of the special group that finds its identity as the doppelganger of the group that proposed the amendment in the first place. The permanence that a constitution requires cannot survive in such an
Philip Chase Bobbitt, Philip Chase Bobbitt - Refl…, loc. 262