Legal theorists must account for conflict resolution despite unresolved truth modalities. [craft]
This puts Griffin firmly on the side of my distinguished colleague Sanford Levinson in his debate with Judge Harry Edwards.2' To my chagrin, I find myself disagreeing with Griffin and Levinson, though I am honored by the company of Judge Edwards. I do not mean that legal scholarship ought to transform itself into the memoranda of an academy of clerks. But I do think that the pursuit of truth requires the theorist to account for the remarkable phenomenon of the resolution of conflict when the means of determining truth conditions-the modalities-continue to conflict and resist coming to closure.
Philip Chase Bobbitt, Philip Chase Bobbitt - Refl…, loc. 571