Judicial interpretive choices reduce to strict construction or consequence-driven pragmatism. [definitional]
The main choices in "interpretive" theory that the new learning allows are either some version of strict construction or a pragmatic approach in which, recognizing the difficult and problematic nature of statutory interpretation, judges use consequences to guide their decisions, always bearing in mind that the relevant consequences include systemic ones such as debasing the currency of statutory language by straying too far from it.
DEFINE: Distinguishes two main interpretive theories in statutory interpretation: strict construction and pragmatic/consequentialist approaches.
Richard A. Posner, Richard A. Posner - What Ha…, loc. 116