ProPublica team had the equivalent of a crystal ball. [fact]
ecause they were doing their research in 2016, the ProPublica team had the equivalent of a crystal ball. Looking at data from two years prior, they actually knew whether these defendants, predicted either to reoffend or not, actually did. And so they asked two simple questions. One: Did the model actually correctly predict which defendants were indeed the “riskiest”? And two: Were the model’s predictions biased in favor of or against any group in particular?
Brian Christian, The Alignment Problem, loc. 11160