Jamal Awil

← The Consequences of Modernity

Abstract systems spare laypeople from mastering technical knowledge in daily life [causal]

Abstract systems have provided a great deal of security in day-to-day life which was absent in pre-modern orders. A person can board a plane in London and reach Los Angeles some ten hours later and be fairly certain that not only will the journey be made safely, but that the plane will arrive quite close to a predetermined time. The passenger may perhaps only have a vague idea of where Los Angeles is, in terms of a global map. Only minimal preparations need to be made for the journey (obtaining passport, visa, air-ticket, and money)—no knowledge of the actual trajectory is necessary. A large amount of "surrounding" knowledge is required to be able to get on the plane, and this is knowledge which has been filtered back from expert systems to lay discourse and action. One has to know what an airport is, what an air-ticket is, and very many other things besides. But security on the journey itself does not depend upon mastery of the technical paraphernalia which make it possible.

XREF: Connects to sociological theorizing on trust in expert systems (Giddens' own framework of disembedding) and how modern institutions function on distributed ignorance.

Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Moderni…, loc. 268