Rather, the misattribution of founder status to Knight has had two pernicious consequences: it. [fact]
We indeed strenuously dispute this notion, on the basis of the information provided in the first section of this chapter. But beyond the factual error of mistaking Knight for the actual progenitors (Simons and Director and, most of all, Hayek), it is necessary to insist that identification of the founder of the Chicago School makes a profound difference to our understanding of the rise of neoliberal economics in the postwar period. We have our own personal doubts as to whether Knight could have successfully organized and orchestrated a weekend picnic, much less a major transnational intellectual movement; but luckily that question need not be settled here. Rather, the misattribution of founder status to Knight has had two pernicious consequences: it has diverted attention away from the fact that the inauguration and establishment of the Chicago School constituted just one component of a much more elaborate transnational institutional project to reinvent a liberalism that had some prospect of challenging the socialist doctrines ascendant in the immediate postwar period.
Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin, loc. 764